WTFOMGBBQFTW!

Wired hits this a little too close to home. Maybe they’re right - I sure as hell know they’re not too far off the mark.

st_geekster_f.jpg

Straight from the horse’s mouth:

1. The Fanboy
Disposition: Speaks mostly in lines from The Simpsons, Star Wars, Highlander, and Ghostbusters. Enjoys arguing about whether Batman or Boba Fett would win in a fight. (Batman.)
Beliefs: The Force exists, but midi-chlorians are bullshit. Han shot first.
Turn-Ons: Princess Leia in slave gear. Starbuck (male and female incarnations). Amazing Fantasy No. 15. Velour uniforms.

2. The Music Geek
Disposition: Would be really happy to introduce you to music better than that overexposed crap you like. Always up for a show, but it’ll totally suck.
Beliefs: MP3s are not as good as CDs, which are not as good as vinyl LPs, which are not as cool as wax cylinders. What your speaker cables are made of matters.
Turn-Ons: A complete set of Sub Pop Singles Club 45s. VH1’s Behind the Music (hair metal only). 0.0 scores on Pitchfork. Vacuum tubes.

3.The Gamer
Disposition: High DEX and INT scores, low CHA (thus, the lack of friends). Given to indecipherable insults (”I pwn3d u, n00b!”).
Beliefs: The game Real World has a great physics engine, hi-res graphics, and convincing surround sound, but the learning curve is too steep. Girls should dress like Yuna in Final Fantasy.
Turn-Ons: Spawn points. Haptic feedback. Pac-Man ringtones. Morgan Webb. Split-screen co-op.

4. The Gadget Guy
Disposition: Sociable while waiting in line on launch day; ferocious in comments on Gizmodo. Seemingly unflappable in the face of early adopter’s remorse (aka Apple Newton Syndrome).
Beliefs: I can fix that. There’s no god but MacGyver. The price will drop in a month, but I need it now.
Turn-Ons: Unboxing videos. Backup batteries. Blue LEDs. Laser pointers. People who RTFM. Things that make loud clicking sounds.

5. The Hacker
Disposition: Chronically crabby — then again, having such a superior intellect is a heavy burden. Paranoid tendencies.
Beliefs: One shall stand, one shall fall. Sun allergy is a real condition. Cybersex: not utterly disgusting. Cory Doctorow is too soft on DRM. 2600 magazine has gotten too commercial.
Turn-Ons: Trinity. l33t fluency. Narc-spotting at DefCon.

6. The Otaku
Disposition: Alarmingly happy. Prefers to read right to left.
Beliefs: Manga is a medium, not a genre. Furries aren’t loathsome. I can learn Japanese from Gundam. Lynn Minmay is the most annoying character in the history of anything. The next major anime release will be a box office hit in the West — this time for sure. It’s not all tentacle porn, OK?
Turn-Ons: Tentacle porn. Dirty Larping. Dating sims. All things kawaii.

Million dollar question: who am I?

Crikey!

It seems that as much as I try not to be, I have to, once in a while, play the role of the ass. This weekend was one of those times.

Names have been removed to protect the innocent (that and the fact that I can’t quite remember what the main actress’ name was in this particular situation). On Saturday, I went out with a group of people and there was this chick, who was in her early 30’s that apparently took a liking to yours truly. She had made a certain series of comments during that night that really didn’t help her cause at all - the type of comments that i find totally unattractive. For example, one that comes to mind: she was basically looking for a boy toy; someone to give her supplemental ego-boosts, while she worked out her infatuation for someone else. Someone else that was there in the goddamn fucking group. Like I wasn’t going to notice? Really. Please, I know I might look like I’m a little slow at times, but give me a fucking break. It was so damn obvious without her having to say something, and yet, lo and behold, she does! And then she thinks I’m going to find her groovy after that?

Soooo, she didn’t quite get the hint that your fearless narrator was avoiding the entire subject during the course of the night. Somewhere along the line, she convinced a friend of mine to send me a message basically saying that she was digging me. I responded, and mind you I had no more patience for the subject by that time, that I’d pass. She’s the type of chick that I would just assign a number and forget about. Not my type and to spare pain and embarrassment all around, I’d pass.

So this friend, the guy who sent me the SMS, is about as drunk as a skunk at the time, sitting right next to her. Something didn’t go click with so much Jack and Coke, so when he reads the damn response to his message, so does she.

So here’s me, rather pissed off I’m dragged into a situation that I would of rather avoided, asking me to explain what the hell is going on and how can I be so inconsiderate and mean. She kept asking “Why am i not you type?” or “Oh, it must be the hair” or “Oh, it’s that i’m too white.” So, I turned around at that point and said with a bit more venom than i wanted to: No, it’s not your physique, it’s your personality. To which she didn’t go ballistic, because she was already skull-fucked by mixing beer, tequila and a blackjack, but did grab her by surprise. And of course, went on the defensive, saying “You don’t know me. How can you say that when you just met me.”

Ah, as a sidenote, she’s apparently was/is/I-have-no-fucking-clue-and-couldn’t-give-a-rat’s-ass studying psych. I responded to her little snide comment: Hold on, if you’re studying psych, then you know that people say more by what they do and act than what they actually say. Plus, you’ve made a few comments tonight that don’t jive with me.

Ah but wait, there is more to this horror story…

She turned around and said: “So what? I have to say that I want a boyfriend or something like that and then you’d be interested?”

My response, trying my best to keep my cool, was: No. You’re not my type of chick. *Pause* (And I got really nasty about this, but I just wanted her as far away from me as humanly possible - for me the issue was over and all this extra talk was going to get nowhere).. and to boot, you’ve got a daughter. I think I’ll pass. I’m not good in those kinds of situations. Been there, done that. No thank you.

Hindsight being 20/20, I should of said something more along the lines of: No, I’m not sloppy seconds for anybody, or some other self-dignifying remark, but, no. What do I do? Play the let-me-piss-you-off-the-best-way-I-know-how card. Oh, and does that get me into trouble. As of note, my remark was just that - nothing evil, or mean, or degrading. Just, you have a daughter. I’m not good with kids (which is totally true) and I don’t want to be in that situation.

However, I fear that the poor chick never got so rejected in her life. And somewhere among all this useless conversation, she says as much.

But, wait for it, it gets even better…

Now, the entire time this conversation is going on, I’m kicking the friend who got me into this chicken shit outfit, who’s stone drunk by now, asking him if (basically telling him that): he wants to leave. That I think he needs some sleep. The dimwit, no thanks to the bottle of Jack Daniel’s which has befuddled his brain in such a fashion that he didn’t get the hint, answered “No. I’ll wait for you.”

She turns around, about the same time as I am kicking the fellow, and says “So what? But I’m not asking you to marry me or anything. I said, with my patience at an end: It doesn’t matter. I don’t want to. period. End of discussion and sorry if there was any misunderstanding. So relax and take it easy. No hard feelings. Water under the bridge. She doesn’t take the hint, apparently.

After about another 15 or 30 minutes agonizing minutes (could of been hours, I have no idea - you know when people say that a minute of pain lasts for like an hour, I think I can relate now) of this entire ordeal, I finally convince my drunkard wayward friend to get up and leave. The problem is: we don’t have a key to the gate to get out. i try to rouse the other drunkards (or sleepy-heads) who do have the keys but the chick beats me to it, and goes “I’ll walk you guys out.”

Drum-roll, please. Yessirrie, bowb, some people just don’t know how to take a hint. I think there are some people who definitely like to be subjected to this kind of drawn-out masochistic torture.

She walks us to the gate, opens the gate, orders my incapacitated friend into the car and the proceeds to for a solid 5 minutes to convince me that we should have a good night kiss. Now, I’ve never been partial to that, it’s insane. What kind of purpose would it serve and what kind of hypocrite would i be by saying no to her, but then giving her a good night kiss? It took like 5 minutes to convince her that I was not going to change my mind. No means no - not maybe. It’s no. Period. I don’t want to, don’t care if you think I’m wrong. Maybe I am, maybe I’m not, but I’ll live with it. Finally, I get into the car, drive off and about 5 minutes I have to laugh so hysterically that I had to pull over.

Unimaginable night.

Heston’s Speech

I remember my son when he was five, explaining to his kindergarten class what his father did for a living. “My Daddy,” he said, “pretends to be people.” There have been quite a few of them. Prophets from the Old and New Testaments, a couple of Christian saints, generals of various nationalities and different centuries, several kings, three American presidents, a French cardinal and two geniuses, including Michelangelo. If you want the ceiling re-painted I’ll do my best. There always seem to be a lot of different fellows up here. I’m never sure which one of them gets to talk. Right now, I guess I’m the guy.

As I pondered our visit tonight it struck me: If my Creator gave me the gift to connect you with the hearts and minds of those great men, then I want to use that same gift now to re-connect you with your own sense of liberty …your own freedom of thought … your own compass for what is right.

Dedicating the memorial at Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln said of America, “We are now engaged in a great Civil War, testing whether this nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure.” Those words are true again. I believe that we are again engaged in a great civil war, a cultural war that’s about to hijack your birthright to think and say what resides in your heart. I fear you no longer trust the pulsing lifeblood of liberty inside you … the stuff that made this country rise from wilderness into the miracle that it is.

Let me back up. About a year ago I became president of the National Rifle Association, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. I ran for office, I was elected, and now I serve … I serve as a moving target for the media who’ve called me everything from “ridiculous” and “duped” to a “brain-injured, senile, crazy old man.” I know … I’m pretty old… but I sure Lord ain’t senile. As I have stood in the crosshairs of those who target Second Amendment freedoms, I’ve realized that firearms are not the only issue. No, it’s much, much bigger than that. I’ve come to understand that a cultural war is raging across our land, in which, with Orwellian fervor, certain acceptable thoughts and speech are mandated.

For example, I marched for civil rights with Dr. King in 1963 — long before Hollywood found it fashionable. But, when I told an audience last year that white pride is just as valid as black pride or red pride or anyone else’s pride, they called me a racist.

I’ve worked with brilliantly talented homosexuals all my life. But, when I told an audience that gay rights should extend no further than your rights or my rights, I was called a homophobe. I served in World War II against the Axis powers. But during a speech, when I drew an analogy between singling out innocent Jews and singling out innocent gun owners, I was called an anti-Semite. Everyone I know knows I would never raise a closed fist against my country. But, when I asked an audience to oppose
this cultural persecution, I was compared to Timothy McVeigh. From Time magazine to friends and colleagues, they’re essentially saying, “Chuck, how dare you speak your mind. You are using language not authorized for public consumption!” But I am not afraid. If Americans believed in political correctness, we’d still be King George’s boys - subjects bound to the British crown.

In his book, “The End of Sanity,” Martin Gross writes that “blatantly irrational behavior is rapidly being established as the norm in almost every area of human endeavor. There seem to be new customs, new rules, new anti-intellectual theories regularly foisted on us from every direction. Underneath, the nation is roiling. Americans know something without a name is undermining the nation, turning the mind mushy when it comes to separating truth from falsehood and right from wrong. And they don’t like it.” Let me read a few examples.

At Antioch college in Ohio, young men seeking intimacy with a coed must get verbal permission at each step of the process from kissing to petting to final copulation … all clearly spelled out in a printed college directive. In New Jersey, despite the death of several patients nationwide who had been infected by dentists who had concealed their AIDs — the state commissioner announced that health providers who are HIV-positive need not. .. need not … tell their patients that they are infected. At William and Mary, students tried to change the name of the school team “The Tribe” because it was supposedly insulting to local Indians, only to learn that authentic Virginia chiefs truly like the name. In San Francisco, city fathers passed an ordinance protecting the
rights of transvestites to cross-dress on the job, and for transsexuals to have separate toilet facilities while undergoing sex change surgery. In New York City, kids who don’t speak a word of Spanish have been placed in bilingual classes to learn their three R’s in Spanish solely because their last names sound Hispanic. At the University of Pennsylvania, in a state where thousands died at Gettysburg opposing slavery, the president of that college officially set up segregated dormitory space for black students. Yeah, I know … that’s out of bounds now.

Dr. King said “Negroes.” Jimmy Baldwin and most of us on the March said “black.” But it’s a no-no now. For me, hyphenated identities are awkward … particularly “Native-American.” I’m a Native American, for God’s sake. I also happen to be a blood-initiated brother of the Miniconjou Sioux. On my wife’s side, my grandson is a thirteenth generation native American … with a capital letter on “American.”

Finally, just last month … David Howard, head of the Washington D.C. Office of Public Advocate, used the word “niggardly” while talking to colleagues about budgetary matters. Of course, “niggardly” means stingy or scanty. But within days Howard was forced to publicly apologize and resign. As columnist Tony Snow wrote: “David Howard got fired because some people in public employ were morons who (a) didn’t know the meaning of niggardly,’ (b) didn’t know how to use a dictionary to discover the meaning, and (c) actually demanded that he apologize for their ignorance.”

What does all of this mean? It means that telling us what to think has evolved into telling us what to say, so telling us what to do can’t be far behind. Before you claim to be a champion of free thought, tell me: Why did political correctness originate on America’s campuses? And why do you continue to tolerate it? Why do you, who’re supposed to debate ideas, surrender to their suppression?

Let’s be honest. Who here thinks your professors can say what they really believe?

It scares me to death, and should scare you too, that the superstition of political correctness rules the halls of reason. You are the best and the brightest. You, here in the fertile cradle of American academia, here in the castle of learning on the Charles River, you are the cream. But I submit that you, and your counterparts across the land, are the most socially conformed and politically silenced generation since Concord Bridge. And as long as you validate that … and abide it … you are - by your grandfathers’ standards - cowards.

Here’s another example. Right now at more than one major university, Second Amendment scholars and researchers are being told to shut up about their findings or they’ll lose their jobs. Why? Because their research findings would undermine big-city mayor’s pending lawsuits that seek to extort hundreds of millions of dollars from firearm manufacturers. I don’t care what you think about guns. But if you are not shocked at that, I am shocked at you.

Who will guard the raw material of unfettered ideas, if not you? Who will defend the core value of academia, if you supposed soldiers of free thought and expression lay down your arms and plead, “Don’t shoot me.” If you talk about race, it does not make you a racist. If you see distinctions between the genders, it does not make you a sexist. If you think critically about a denomination, it does not make you anti-religion. If you accept but don’t celebrate homosexuality, it does not make you a homophobe.

Don’t let America’s universities continue to serve as incubators for this rampant epidemic of new McCarthyism. But what can you do? How can anyone prevail against such pervasive social subjugation? The answer’s been here all along. I learned it 36 years ago, on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C., standing with Dr. Martin Luther King and two hundred thousand people. You simply … disobey. Peaceably, yes. Respectfully, of course. Nonviolently, absolutely. But when told how to think or what to say or how to behave, we don’t. We disobey social protocol that stifles and stigmatizes personal freedom.

I learned the awesome power of disobedience from Dr. King … who learned it from Gandhi, and Thoreau, and Jesus, and every other great man who led those in the right against those with the might. Disobedience is in our DNA. We feel innate kinship with that disobedient spirit that tossed tea into Boston Harbor, that sent Thoreau to jail, that refused to sit in the back of the bus, that protested a war in Viet Nam.

In that same spirit, I am asking you to disavow cultural correctness with massive disobedience of rogue authority, social directives and onerous laws that weaken personal freedom. But be careful … it hurts. Disobedience demands that you put yourself at risk.

Dr. King stood on lots of balconies. You must be willing to be humiliated … to endure the modern-day equivalent of the police dogs at Montgomery and the water cannons at Selma. You must be willing to experience discomfort. I’m not complaining, but my own decades of social activism have taken their toll on me. Let me tell you a story.

A few years back I heard about a rapper named Ice-T who was selling a CD called “Cop Killer” celebrating ambushing and murdering police officers. It was being marketed by none other than Time/Warner, the biggest entertainment conglomerate in the world.

Police across the country were outraged. Rightfully so-at least one had been murdered. But Time/Warner was stonewalling because the CD was a cash cow for them, and the media were tiptoeing around it because the rapper was black. I heard Time/Warner had a stockholders meeting scheduled in Beverly Hills. I owned some shares at the time, so I decided to attend. What I did there was against the advice of my family and colleagues. I asked for the floor. To a hushed room of a thousand average American stockholders, I simply read the full lyrics of “Cop Killer”- every vicious, vulgar, instructional word.

“I GOT MY 12 GAUGE SAWED OFF I GOT MY HEADLIGHTS TURNED OFF I’M ABOUT TO BUST SOME SHOTS OFF I’M ABOUT TO DUST SOME COPS OFF…” It got worse, a lot worse. I won’t read the rest of it to you. But trust me, the room was a sea of shocked, frozen, blanched faces. The Time/Warner executives squirmed in their chairs and stared at their shoes. They hated me for that.

Then I delivered another volley of sick lyric brimming with racist filth, where Ice-T fantasizes about sodomizing two 12-year old nieces of Al and Tipper Gore.

“SHE PUSHED HER BUTT AGAINST MY ….” Well, I won’t do to you here what I did to them. Let’s just say I left the room in echoing silence. When I read the lyrics to the waiting press corps, one of them said “We can’t print that.” “I know,” I replied, “but Time/Warner’s selling it.” Two months later, Time/Warner terminated Ice-T’s contract. I’ll never be offered another film by Warners, or get a good review from Time magazine. But disobedience means you must be willing to act, not just talk. When a mugger sues his elderly victim for defending herself … jam the switchboard of the district attorney’s office. When your university is pressured to lower standards until 80% of the students graduate with honors … choke the halls of the board of regents. When an 8-year-old boy pecks a girl’s cheek on the playground and gets hauled into court for sexual harassment … march on that school and block its
doorways. When someone you elected is seduced by political power and betrays you…petition them, oust them, banish them. When Time magazine’s cover portrays millennium nuts as deranged, crazy Christians holding a cross as it did last month … boycott their magazine and the products it advertises.

So that this nation may long endure, I urge you to follow in the hallowed footsteps of the great disobediences of history that freed
exiles, founded religions, defeated tyrants, and yes, in the hands of an aroused rabble in arms and a few great men, by God’s grace, built this country. If Dr. King were here, I think he would agree. Thank you.

Author,

Charlton Heston

Doing the Right Thing

When everyone else says you’re wrong. That’s what Jobs, as in Steve Jobs, does. That’s what Sales and Marketing is all about. Sales and Marketing is not about being nice, it’s about understanding that you’re at war. Literally. You’re at war with your competitors. You’re at war with the media (unless you’re a media-love-child) and you’re at war with the mind-share and conceptualizations of your customers. You have to adapt, create strategies, implement tiger teams, cause uproars, and be controversial. That’s the reality of any industry, but it’s especially the reality of the computer industry.

I’ve written a few articles on Steve Jobs and his position as CEO of Apple. And I believe a lot of people miss the point. The Wired article linked at the beginning is the perfect example of why Steve Jobs has been successful in turning around a fledging company into a very lucrative empire. It’s all about how deep you drink the cool-aid. Jeffrey Gitomer’s Sales Caffeine e-Zine Issue 332 is a perfect example of this. He has four telltale signs, outside of body language and delivery, that make it painfully obvious to your customers that you don’t believe one iota of what you’re telling them:

  1. You try to justify your price.
  2. You apologize for your price.
  3. You rationalize your price.
  4. You have to go back into your presentation to clarify your price.
  5. You try to ignore the signs that are evident hoping that they’ll go away.

Ok, so they’re 5, and these are just focused on justifying the price for whatever product or service you have to offer. The rabbit hole goes much deeper than this, however. Steve Jobs might be a tyrant. Apple might be doing everything backwards, not following the Sillicon Valley mantra of “don’t do evil,” but why follow the pack? Why be the same as the rest? If you’re the same as everyone else, then why should anyone purchase anything from you, other than on the pure basis of price? And you know, when everything is basically the same, the only thing you have left in your arsenal of Sales & Marketing tactics is price, which means, somewhere, someone down the road pays for it. It might not be the consumer, but I bet it will be the company, that with slimmer margins has to reduce costs. And what do companies usually do when the have to cut costs? Lay off people. There you have it, folks, someone paid for the cheaper product because no one averted the price war that ensued because no one drank the Kool-Aid deep enough.

If you want to be successful in your sales or marketing position, you have to believe in what you’re selling. Customers never, ever, not in a million years want to be sold to, they want to buy (just so happens that Jeffrey’s site sloan is that exactly). Not only do they want to buy, but they want to buy something that makes them proud. Look at the halo effect of any of Apple’s products. A person starts with an iPod, they use iTunes, buy music and video and can identify, intuitively, with the simplicity of it all. It also adds to their social status and thusly, makes them feel better about themselves. They’ll start to dabble and move onto more Apple products because of that same re-enforcing, self-fulfilling prophecy that they’re created. That’s exactly what you want your customers to feel when they’re buying your offering - you want them to have that warm fuzzy feeling. You want them to believe in your products and services as much as you believe in them, because, if you don’t, you’re not going to be around very long (or you will be, but in a world of hurt).

I’m sure you’ve heard this a million times before. I’m sure you’ve gone to dozens of hours of sales and marketing training. But for one moment, did you ever put that into practice? Do you know what your company’s overall strategy is? Can you articulate it in words that someone else can understand? Can you explain it to someone outside of your industry? Nelson Mandela once said: If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his language, that goes to his heart. Keep that in mind next time you speak to your customers.

It’s extremely important to engage your customer, not just in the traditional sales-cycle approach, but also how you address the issues. If you’re talking about server technologies, don’t talk about the technology - he most likely doesn’t really care how it’s done, if not, what does that technology do for him. In other words, instead of talking about the feature set, as a feature set, talk about what that feature set does for him - and instead of using words like “you”, “your company”, “your management”, use words like “us”, “our management” - make that person believe you’re on their side. Talk to that person in their language, using their jargon, using their problems, as if it were your own. Don’t assume your audience is even familiar with your internal jargon. You’ll establish rapport much more quickly that way, than if you try to pull them into your world.

Remember that you are at war. You want to win them over, but you don’t want to show you’re being driven by a commission check. You want them to believe that what you’re saying is what you truly believe is best for them. Remember, if you’re selling something, you probably know more about that product or service than the person in front of you, use that to your advantage - but be humble about it. Think of it this way, you’re there to teach them the error of their ways, not by invalidating what they’ve done, but by showing them there’s an easier way to do it. One that’s less painful for them personally and one that is less painful for the company. You want to make sure that they have that same warm fuzzy feeling that Steve Jobs’ gives his customers every single time they purchase from him.

There is a caveat, however, you can’t do any of this unless you totally, whole-heartedly, beyond a shadow of doubt, believe in two things: that you’re at war, and that you’re biggest bad ass out there (but humble about it, of course).

And The Street Sign Says…

Memory Lane

Good-night! Good-night! As we so oft have said beneath the roof of midnight, in the days that are no more, and shall no more return. Thou hast but taken up thy lamp and gone to bed; I stay a little longer, as one stays to cover up the embers that still burn.

Art is Resistance


800×600.jpg

Art is resistance. You have a mouth, use it.

Year 0000

Nine Inch Nails has to be one of my favourite bands. A friend of mine pointed me to Year Zero’s Wiki page. If you don’t know what Year Zero is all about, you have to read the wiki. I’m not going to spoil it for you. We can discuss it later - in the comments or as another post, but it’s worth it.

Watch, think about it and we’ll discuss:

Brave New World

Bill Maher’s Real Time has always been an interesting show - at least with a lot of comic relief - and, for once, it appears that Bill found a politician that shares several of his own view points. There are several videos that are related to this one, and I would suggest taking out the time to look through them all, however, the reason that Ron Paul has received a lot of the attention of non-mainstream media (*cough*anything not fox*cough*) has been due to his position on non-intervention.

There’s also another clip that basically summarized what happened (of course, Bill Maher is extremely sarcastic, but that’s the point, isn’t it?)

In that South Carolina debate, everyone, but Ron Paul, talks about more war, talks about terrorism, talks about Guantanamo, talks about torture. On the other hand, in few words, Ron Paul shoots back and says: let’s have some personal accountability. Not in those words, mind you, but close enough. Non-intervention, right now, sounds like a charm. The US shouldn’t intervene in local affairs of a country, unless it’s a creditable threat to national security. It’s exactly these types of policies that the US has gained the “puto gringo estupido” reputation in Latin America. It’s exactly these types of policies that creates and harbours resentment towards to the US in various nations. The fact that the US covertly or openly supports and sends aid to a certain country creates the resentment with that country’s enemies. I mean, why be pissed at the country that you’re fighting with, if you know that there’s someone else fueling them.

It seems to me, that at this point, it makes more sense to cool off, change foreign policies to something a bit more humble, use the carrot instead of the stick, and try to regain some self-respect.

The State of the Union

Here we are, once again, after 4 years (really, 8 years in my opinion), preparing to vote for the next president. The media is hosting “fair” debates with each of the parties as they gear up for the primaries. Accusations, comments bordering on slander, hot questions and subtle retaliations are flying left and right. Topics to distract the public are always at the forefront so we’re so caught up in issues that aren’t even issues in order not to question deep seated and rooted problems that plague the US. The media, nay the other candidates, would love for the public to discuss whether the Clinton’s are hindering the release of the records of their time spent in the White House. Or evidence of plants in the debates. Or if Edwards or Obama had anything to do with the Whirlpool/Maytag plants shutting down in Illinois. Or the faith (or lack thereof) or the experimentation of drugs in childhood of the potential candidates. Or attacking Huckabee’s son as evidence that the father is not ready for office. There are even troglodytes that would love to spin the politics of Obama’s skin colour, or Hilary Clinton’s sex.

All of this is clearly stupid. People who know me, know I’m neither Democrat or Republican. I’m not that idiotic misnomer of “undecided voter,” either. People who know me, know that I’m more centrist, politically speaking - believing in a strong, free market, a simple (note: simple) government (and if that means less, then it means less government now) but with strong social programmes, focusing on developing the potential of its constituents. And I’ll be very clear on this: developing the potential of its constituents means focusing on basic healthcare (not this universal “free” healthcare - the government has no reason to plan emergencies on your behalf - it was never intended to do so, and never will be better at than you). Strong educational programmes - improving this “remember this date or that date” regurgitation bullshit to students and people who can actually reason (better yet if they can read and write at their grade level). Balancing out the tax system between state and federal so there’s more money in your pocket (you’re always going to be taxed for the infrastructure - highways, interstates, pipelines, etcetera - and that’s not including local, county and state government maintenance “fees”), because we all know that we should know better than the government on how to spend our money. And if you believe your money isn’t going into maintaining the infrastructure in the US, all you have to do is go to a third world country, let’s say Costa Rica, which I know very damn well, and you’ll cry to get the streets back like you have them up north.

If you think about what I’ve just said, there is a candidate who thinks, or at least talks, the same way. It’s Ron Paul. Now, I don’t agree with everything he has to say, but he does have a convincing speech. So instead of slander, or questioning his experience, or faith, or use of drugs, or lack thereof of any of these so-called “issues,” let’s see what he has to say.

He talks about American Independence and Sovereignty, which is important and he stressed in an interview that he’s not an isolationist, yet, you read his position on the aforementioned website and I can’t help to wonder: where are the US products going to go if we can’t agree with other nations, via treaties or arrangements, on tariffs? The CAFTA-DR agreement he mentions was something the Republicans pushed heavily, albeit, with corporate backing, why? Because Central America is a Low Cost Producer, in general terms. Is this a real attack on US independence? Well, in the same terms that the CAFTA-DR agreement was an attack on any of the Central American countries that ratified the treaty. Remember the series of articles I wrote about this a while back? The CAFTA-DR agreement does not dictate that doctors (or, actually the patients) would have to deal out prescriptions for alternative medicine - since, theoretically, it’s not medicine. The government would have to put all the various types of herbs and alternative medicines on a schedule with regulations governing their prescription, just like any other medical drug out there today. Of course, the CAFTA-DR treaty has no language against this either. The point that Ron Paul brings up about how the wording is done and what powers does the CAFTA-DR agreement bind, is worrying. The topic about the UN wanting to tax the US is hokey at best. If you read what’s going on in the UN, in regards to this, it has nothing to do with the US as a target - any country with lower taxes would be a target. The UN states that they’re not talking about excising another tax, they’re talking about sharing taxing information more freely. Now, I can understand this for certain countries - but the US, in a simple view, has a simple tax plan (what makes it difficult are all the loopholes and conditional statements that the Internal Revenue Code has - and trust me, I know what I’m talking about on this, and if there’s something that stumps me, I can always bring in a well known authority on this). Of course, talking about what the UN wants to do or not do, is speculation right now, since there’s no document with the proposed organisation and its details. And of course, each country would have to sign - and the US has been known not to sign treaties that the government in power doesn’t agree with. So it wouldn’t be the first time something like that happens. However, the idea of the amero and the North American Union is totally out of whack - in and of itself, and I totally agree with Ron Paul that it’s an attack on US sovereignty, although, I have the suspicion that’s it’s for different reasons.

He also talks about Border Security and Immigration. This is a touchy issue - a lot of the manual labour in the US is being done by immigrants - legal or not - due to the fact that many US citizens don’t want to do them - especially in the agricultural industry. Evidence abounds on this issue. The US must be flexible in how this is managed - if no one in the US wants the jobs (and there are several thousands, if not millions of people who need jobs), then why should the farmers pay for that by losing crops? Now, I’m all for strengthening the welfare system so no one abuses it - that goes for illegal immigrants as much as for legal residents (residents or citizens). No one should abuse the system - it costs all of us dollar from our tax quota. And no matter what Latin America believes of US immigration practices, it’s actually not as bad, as let’s say Holland, which is based on blood ties to the country, and if not, then you must be “culturally retrained“. While I’m not opposed completely to the 14th amendment’s idea of automatic citizenship, Ron Paul is. However, I can understand where he is coming from. The amendment had a totally different intention that it does now, and it is partially a probable cause of the immigration problem that the US faces. And to make this even more clear, I was not born in the US - however, one of my parents was a US citizen. When we moved back from Costa Rica to the US, I was given a resident green card. Obviously, both of my parents were legal residents of the US, which made the issue much more crystal clear (as even stated by the, then, INS when I reclaimed my US citizenship). I believe this is a middle ground - no automatic citizenship, but a middle ground legal residency - whereby certain conditions must be met. Abuse of the welfare and social support system cannot be tolerated - and if the US is lenient in how you become a resident, the legislation should be equally strict in how to maintain it. What I don’t agree with is not admitting the children of these immigrants into our public school system. Remember, I support social development, and I don’t believe the children should pay for the sins of the father, so to speak. Hence, the idea of a middle ground residency - if they use the system, they should pay just like everyone else. It’s called equal opportunity. I agree that we shouldn’t reward people who break laws, but most of these people are trying to break even - trying to “live the US dream,” to put it in words. They’re not evil. They’re not the devil, and if we give them a status that would input money in the system, they’re not stealing anyone’s jobs. Most of them do jobs that no one else would. Or who here would be a janitor? A trash collector? Or a harvester?

Of course, no discourse would be complete without touching the Debt and Tax issues that the US faces. While Ron Paul is focusing on the issues of debt as a government, the issue of personal debt is a looming problem - one that won’t go away easily. Of course, having the Federal Reserve print more money, to fuel the government deficit spending tactic, while China and Japan holding a large amount of US bonds is never a good thing. The economy is where it’s at for a whole host of reasons. I’ll go into this later, but my bottom line is: have some personally accountability, for crying out loud. Government debt and continuous money printing, lowering interest rates and trying to bail out corporations is hurting the economy, but it goes far beyond that. Lowering taxes might stem the bleeding economy for a while, but not if all that money is put in to pull more loans - which is what’s got us here in the first place. Ron Paul talks about going back to the Gold Standard, which is a risky en devour, but it could, if the currency is also backed by other “precious commodities” to pan out into strengthening the dollar once again. Of course, the flip side to this is inflation/deflation cycles depending on the specie that they’re based on, which hard-backed currencies are known to be prone to. Fiat currencies have their place, and if the markets bear the cycles in which faith wans and strengthens, it’s not a bad alternative. The issue with fiat currency is maintaining that faith - something which the market in the US, and then the Fed have failed to do so far. The impending financial disaster in the US economy has far more to do with personal debt and the fact that people are coming up short (the money has to come from somewhere - the creditors of those private banks also want their money - which the banks themselves have muddied with the entire MBS fiasco). Returning to the gold standard may or may not solve this problem - and my money, so to speak, is betting on that it will not.

Now, I’ve only touched upon 3 of the 16 issues Ron Paul addresses, but this article is as long as it needs to be in the time being. As the primaries progress, so will my comments on the issues that crop up. I’m not endorsing anyone with this - it’s a free for all, but at least, for once, Ron Paul sounds much more sane than the other candidates from either side of the house.

Happy New Year

Happy new year, everyone. As always, I’ll be partying in the New Year, just so I don’t stop following old habits. Wherever you are, whatever you are doing, have a good one. Smoke me a kipper, I’ll be back in the morning (well, afternoon).